Explore the UNIONE™ Solutions Universe 19 intelligence families · 256 pages
A defect claim must separate non-conformance, cause, cure and residual loss.
Design, materials, workmanship, installation, performance, maintenance and misuse can produce the same visible failure through different responsibility paths.
The Defect Attribution Tree
Translate site events into a traceable chain of entitlement, evidence, time, cost and outcome.
The Defect Attribution Tree
Project decision pathwayIdentify contractual specification / standard.
Document failure and extent.
Use testing / expert analysis.
Choose proportionate rectification.
Quantify delay, loss or diminution where available.
What can change entitlement or quantum while the project continues.
The analysis should refresh as programme, records, instructions, testing and payment positions move.
Design responsibility
Employer design and contractor design can split risk.
Fitness for purpose
May differ from reasonable-skill-and-care standards.
Latent defects
Discovery may occur after ordinary defects period.
Access / destructive testing
Evidence gathering can damage asset.
Betterment
Rectification should not automatically produce unrelated upgrade value.
Operational misuse
Post-handover conduct may contribute to failure.
Build the record contemporaneously.
Construction intelligence becomes more reliable when the project, commercial and legal teams use the same event chronology.
Fix scope, programme, price and responsibility.
Identify event and preserve contractual position.
Capture site, programme and cost evidence.
Test causation, entitlement and quantum.
Use prevention, specialist review or arbitration.
The institution can stay close to the project before the claim becomes forensic.
UNIONE™'s Construction Panel combines legal and technical specialist expertise, allowing defect causation and contractual liability to be tested together rather than in separate silos.
Reconstruct project history after positions harden.
The programme, notice and cost records are reconstructed after delay, disruption or payment positions have already hardened.
Keep claims architecture alive during the works.
Time, scope, evidence, payment and dispute prevention remain observable throughout the project.