CIS™ makes dispute-readiness measurable.
A 1-100 institutional score derived from DPC Standard v1.0. Designed for decision-makers who already use third-party scores in diligence, credit, underwriting and investment workflows.
Sample architecture follows the live UNIONE™ CIS™ page. A formal CIS™ is issued under the published DPC Standard methodology.
Six published checkpoints. No black box.
The formal CIS™ score uses the published weightings already established by UNIONE™. That gives the score a defined methodology rather than an unexplained proprietary number.
Clarity, enforceability and internal consistency of the dispute resolution clause.
Alignment between governing law, arbitration seat and enforcement compatibility.
Asset locations, enforcement jurisdictions and Convention status considered at signing.
Start with one contract. Scale when the workflow proves useful.
The current live CIS™ page already establishes three access models. The wider Contract Intelligence family can retain those while deeper review products are separately scoped.
Per CIS™ contract assessment · current live pricing.
Per year · up to 10 CIS™ assessments · current live pricing.
Do not review only one contract. Understand the portfolio.
For banks, insurers, multinationals, PE portfolios and large contracting organisations, the real opportunity is repeatable contract intelligence - not a one-off assessment.
Use the same published methodology to create a comparable dispute-readiness view across a contract portfolio, facility book, target-company dataset or business unit.
For larger users, the direction is an enterprise data layer: bulk portfolio scoring, APIs, internal dashboards, contract governance and referral into deeper review only where the score or flags justify it.
- Use the same published methodology to create a comparable dispute-readiness view across a contract portfolio, facility book, target-company dataset or business unit.
The risk owner is often not the disputes lawyer.
The existing CIS™ proposition already identifies a broader buyer universe. The master Contract Intelligence category allows UNIONE™ to address the people who approve, finance, insure and manage the transaction.
Independent institutional review before board approval, signing or material amendment.
Contract dispute-readiness as an additional diligence input alongside credit and counterparty risk.
Identify dispute architecture weaknesses across target-company contracts before closing.
Not a substitute for legal review.
Contract Intelligence™ is designed to sit alongside the work of transaction counsel and in-house legal teams. The purpose is not to renegotiate the legal advice. It is to independently test the agreement through the future-dispute and enforcement lens.
Transaction counsel remains responsible for legal advice, drafting, negotiation, regulatory questions and the client's commercial objectives.
UNIONE™ looks forward into dispute creation, escalation, procedural coherence and enforcement readiness.
Different transactions need different outputs.
A clause check should stay focused. A high-value Independent Contract Review should create a decision architecture that senior legal and commercial teams can actually use.
Targeted instruments for a defined question, score or approval workflow.
A deeper institutional review designed for material cross-border agreements.
Clause / CIS™ / Risk Review - Targeted instruments for a defined question, score or approval workflow.
From contract to decision.
A practical institutional workflow designed to be useful before execution and repeatable across portfolios.
Contract, transaction context and relevant jurisdictions are submitted confidentially.
Identify parties, law, seat, performance locations, asset locations and dispute pathway.
Apply the Contract Intelligence lens and, where requested, the formal CIS™ methodology.