When arbitration is the right decision, the procedure should fit the dispute.

Procedure should understand the industry context.

UNIONE™ can route cases toward sector-specialist panels and clause architectures while keeping all proceedings under the same Rules v3.0 institutional framework.

Implementation, licensing, IP, data, service levels and AI evidence.

Offtake, pricing, performance, force majeure and energy-transition disputes.

Share purchase, earn-out, warranty, indemnity and shareholder disputes.

Make the hearing more usable while it is happening.

The live Standard Procedure already references UNIONE™ Hearing Intelligence tools. The Solutions section can make these visible as practical procedural infrastructure rather than hide them inside a generic AI Tools page.

Structured hearing record for counsel, tribunal and case administration.

Identify recurring issues, references and factual points during the hearing.

Condensed hearing intelligence to help orient the next session or procedural step.

UNIONE™ is not trying to make arbitration disappear. It is putting arbitration in the right place.

What changes is the architecture around it: the contract may already have been intelligence-tested, prevention may already have been attempted, the dispute may already have been assessed, and the award will move toward enforcement readiness before it leaves the system.

Arbitration is often the institution’s principal product and the award its natural end point.

What changes is the architecture around it: the contract may already have been intelligence-tested, prevention may already have been attempted, the dispute may already have been assessed, and the award will move toward enforcement readiness before it leaves the system.

- Arbitration is often the institution’s principal product and the award its natural end point.

AI-generated evidence should not enter arbitration invisibly.

Rules v3.0 contains a dedicated framework for AI-generated and AI-assisted evidence. The Tribunal retains authority over admissibility, authentication, reliability and weight, while the Rules impose disclosure and verification expectations where AI materially contributes to the evidence relied upon.

Admissibility, authentication, reliability and weight remain with the Tribunal.

Material AI involvement should be disclosed rather than presented as purely human-origin evidence.

The AI system used and relevant methodology can become part of reliability assessment.

One rules system. Three procedural depths.

The live UNIONE™ procedure architecture already differentiates disputes by value, complexity, speed and hearing needs. The Solutions layer should help businesses choose the track rather than force them to navigate procedural jargon alone.

The primary procedure for international commercial disputes of any value or complexity.

Eight official clauses. Different commercial needs.

The live Model Clauses Library already provides eight copy-ready clause architectures. The process should route users to the clause that matches the procedure, tribunal structure, sector and enforcement strategy they actually want.

Clause architecture that expressly foregrounds ERR™ and enforcement planning.

Fast-track arbitration with sole arbitrator and compressed procedure.

Technology panel appointment with Article 28 AI Evidence Protocol.

From Notice to Tribunal.

Identify the parties, dispute, relief and arbitration agreement.

UNIONE™ acknowledges filing and registers the case under the selected track.

Respondent files its Response and any counterclaim within the applicable timetable.

Where elected, use the Structured Resolution window before tribunal constitution.

One arbitrator or three - matched to the procedure and dispute.

Standard Procedure gives parties the choice of a sole arbitrator or three-member tribunal. Expedited and Simplified Procedures use a sole arbitrator. All appointments remain subject to independence and impartiality requirements.

Appropriate for many commercial disputes, and mandatory under Expedited and Simplified tracks. If parties cannot agree under the applicable framework, UNIONE™ appoints from the relevant Panel.

Under Standard Procedure, each party may nominate one arbitrator and UNIONE™ appoints the presiding arbitrator, subject to the Rules and applicable independence requirements.