Law No. 9.307/1996 as expanded in 2015.
The statute permits arbitration of disposable patrimonial rights and expressly authorises direct / indirect public administration to use arbitration for qualifying disputes.
Tribunal may request judicial assistance through an arbitral letter.
Arbitrability - Capable parties may arbitrate disposable patrimonial rights.
Administration - 2015 reform expressly permits qualifying public-administration arbitration.
The local legal system changes with the commercial problem.
Country Intelligence connects directly to the sector universe rather than treating every arbitration as procedurally identical.
Construction / infrastructure - Concessions, EPC and public-private projects.
Energy / resources - Oil, gas, power, mining and renewables.
Trade / commodities - Agriculture, supply and cross-border trade.
Domestic award challenge remains statutory rather than merits appeal.
Brazil’s law identifies grounds for nullity while preserving arbitral finality.
Brazilian law lists defects capable of invalidating an award.
Interested party may seek nullity before the competent judiciary under statutory procedure.
Validity of agreement, tribunal authority and procedural fairness remain central themes.
The 2015 reform remains foundational; STJ case law continues to refine foreign-award recognition.
Recent STJ jurisprudence confirms a recognition-focused rather than merits-review approach.
Public administration, urgent relief and carta arbitral remain core modernisation features.
STJ homologated foreign arbitral award after checking recognition requirements.
STJ accepted non-rogatory service where unequivocal receipt was proven in the arbitration context.
Brazil-connected clauses should anticipate public entities, Portuguese-language enforcement and urgent-relief sequencing.
The 2015 reform materially affects how sophisticated project and public-contract clauses should be drafted.
Brazilian seat and institutional rules should be expressly chosen.
Coordinate pre-arbitral court relief and institution of arbitration.
If seat is outside Brazil, plan STJ homologation and later execution.
The Brazil Court-Tribunal Handover
Brazil’s 2015 reform makes the transition from pre-arbitration court relief to tribunal control especially important.
Article 22-A permits court cautionary / urgent relief before arbitration is instituted.
The measure loses effect if arbitration is not instituted within the statutory period.
Article 22-B gives arbitrators power to maintain, modify or revoke prior court relief.
Brazilian courts support arbitration before, during and after the proceedings.
The 2015 reform clarified urgent relief and judicial assistance.
Tribunal may maintain, modify or revoke court relief.
Foreign arbitral awards require recognition by the Superior Court of Justice before execution in Brazil.
Pre-arbitral court relief - Available before arbitration is instituted.